Identifying risk treatment options

most appropriate risk treatment options for each of the risks you have determined are unacceptable. As we stated above, the purpose of this is to reduce the likelihood and consequences of a risk impacting your community or environment.

There are many differing options available to treat the risks you have analysed. It is not viable or cost-effective to implement them all, therefore some form of process for selecting the most appropriate, viable and cost-effective mix of risk treatment options must be put in place. This process must take into account such factors as legal, social, political and economic considerations (EMA, 2000b, p19).

1. Identify and evaluate available options

The first stage in this process is not just identifying the wide range of options available, but evaluating those options. Each option must be assessed to determine its potential effects with regard to reducing the likelihood and consequences of the risk. The considerations mentioned above need to be kept in mind when evaluating each option. One very important aspect to bear in mind here is that when considering the various options, risks to others are not inadvertently increased.

2. Selection of preferred risk treatment option(s)

Once each of the potential options has been evaluated, a decision needs to be made with regard to identifying which options are the most appropriate, effective and legally, socially, politically and economically acceptable and viable.

3. Plan and implement the risk treatment options

Once the most appropriate and acceptable risk treatment options have been selected, there is a need to develop a plan for implementing the selected options and then actually implementing that plan. Such plans should contain the strategies and tactics required to successfully implement the chosen treatment options. The implementation of effective risk treatment options requires an effective risk management system to be in place. This system should provide methods for implementation, assign roles, responsibilities and accountability for risk treatment actions and a process for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the risk treatment plan.



Activity 9.3

learning portfolio activity

Read

Textbook: Standards Australia / Standards New Zealand (2004), AS/NZS 4360/2004 Risk management, Sydney, pp. 20 - 22

Emergency Management Australia, (2000b), Emergency risk management: Applications guide. EMA: Canberra. pp.19 - 22

Read the above readings from your texts which deals with treating risks . As you complete each section of each reading, stop and consider how you will implement that aspect of the process for identifying risk treatment options within your own project.

Once you have completed the reading, start putting together your draft risk treatment options.

  • Generate risk treatment options relevant to your risk assessment;
  • Consider the assessment criteria for the risk treatment options;
  • Assess and select the most appropriate mix of risk treatment options;

We will examine the development and documentation of the risk treatment plan in the next section.

Print this activity

 

 

 

 

about this CD | site-map | © Charles Sturt University