Deficiencies in emergency management: A case study

There are numerous examples of situations in which the initial response and subsequent actions were not carried out efficiently or indeed at all.

 

Activity 1.3

Read

Reading 1: Caring for the community in disasters: The short-term aspects.

During your reading consider how the situation might have been better handled.

This activity is based on the Brisbane Floods of January 1974, and provides you with an opportunity to examine this inefficiency or inactivity in response.

Lessons from the Brisbane floods

On a sheet of paper I want you to list those problems that you believe could have been overcome if risk assessment/hazard analysis, emergency management planning and standard operating procedures had been in place?

Risk Assessment/Hazard Analysis:
Emergency Management Planning:
SOP:

List those organisations that you think may have benefited from having emergency management plans and SOP?

Plans:
SOP:

Accepting that very little planning had been done in Brisbane prior to the floods, do you think that some of the problems might have been overcome if exercises had been conducted? If so, briefly list in what way(s) would they have benefited the organisations involved?

How would more adequate training have improved the response and in what areas might training have been appropriate?

Print this activity

The conduct of risk assessment/hazard analysis and emergency management planning is only one part of the overall emergency prevention and preparedness process. Both need to be followed by the production of SOP, people need to be trained in the procedures and both the plan and SOP need to be exercised.

Topics 2, 3 and 4 of this subject will help you to develop the knowledge and skills to enable you to:

how to use this CD | site-map |© Charles Sturt University